According to Zachary argues in Chapter 3 “Finding and getting to know your Mentor”, about how mentees discovering the kind of mentor that they need by making sure you and your mentor are compatible. When choosing a mentor if you and your mentor are not compatible with one another chances are the relationship will not last. According to Zachary, (2009) there is a model that would help mentees find the best fit for a mentor which is called “Criteria based decision making model which basically helps mentees find their right fit of a mentor” (pg.
40). In the model there were steps that stood out to me which were “Identifying your goal” and “Create a list of criteria”. The first step was “identifying your goal”, is the step in which mentees can administer the criteria to enable you to choose which tutor is appropriate for you.
It can be done by assessing why you need a guide and what are you hoping to learn and why it is critical. You ought to have a superior feeling of what you need to accomplish in the long haul. The second step was “creating a list of criteria”, in which mentees have to recognize qualities you require in a tutor and think about your vision of what’s to come. Mentees must take a gander at what sort of help has worked for them previously. The third step was “Determine qualities that are musts” this is the piece of your rundown which are necessities that are non negotiable.
Exceedingly imperative that you keep your must to a base since they are your solid needs. The fourth step was”Rank the remaining criteria in order of importance and assign a value to each”, which means jotting your rundown keeping in mind the end goal to the most imperative by giving each an esteem. It is vital on the grounds that you will utilize these qualities later when you measure your coach’s decisions against the criteria.The fifth step was “List the possible options”, in this progression you need to ensure that you don’t confine your decisions. Mentee’s will assess individuals on how your rundown measure up against your criteria. The sixth step was “Eliminate options that don’t meet the musts”,One of the capable advances you are picking the qualities that your guide must have. Try not to pick coaches that can’t give what you require.
The seventh step was “Rate each option against wants”, In this progression mentees will utilize a scale from 1 to 10 to rate every potential tutor that stands in connection to your needs. The eighth step was”Make the decision”, On the off chance that mentees have been straightforward with themselves. There ought to be an assessment of the competitor that demonstrates who best serves your characterized should and needs.
The rating will help decide the most fitting decision for you. The author talked about how when talking to potential mentors. The way to finding a mentor is really enlisting a guide for you. Mentors need to realize that mentees are enthusiastic when they realize that they will turn out to be more resourceful by helping with your self-improvement. It is huge that to coaches you are authentic, indicate enthusiasm for your future and are available to input and conferred.Crisp and Cruz argue in “Mentoring college students” a wide but hypothetical viewpoint of mentoring in distinction to business, psychology, and education to a proposed hypothetical system particular to mentoring college students. The article talked about how mentoring is important to the accomplishments of students.
The methods that Crisp and Cruz used in the article was two writing surveys hypothetical reviews of mentoring in the instruction, business, psychology and education. All the more barely centered experimental survey particular to consider analyzing the effect of coaching school understudies on some part of understudy achievement. The primary audit incorporated a survey of 52 hypothetical papers and experimental investigations. They were fixated on the improvement as well as testing of a coaching hypothetical structure in journal articles.
Second writing was experimentally based segment of the original copy which was an audit that used 42 diary articles and national gathering introductions. The audit was available to all observationally based diary articles distributed in the vicinity of 1990 and summer 2007.According to Crisp and Cruz (2009), “The results showed that definitions and characteristics of mentoring was Mentoring is not a new concept as it may date back as far as the Stone Age.
The origins of the word ”mentor” stem from Greek mythology. In the Odyssey, the main character, Odysseus, entrusts his friend, Mentor, to help him prepare to fight in the Trojan War” (para. 7). Meaning the motivation behind a Mentor fills in as a shrewd, capable and trusted consultant who guides improvement of a mentee. That is why it is so significant that college students specifically have mentors to correct them and help them grow as a person in their career.ReferencesCrisp, G., Cruz, I. (2009).
Mentoring College Students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. 50(525–545). DOI 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2Zachary, L.J.
(2009). The mentee’s guide:Making mentoring work for you. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.