Making Children Feel Safe Social Work Essay

Topic: EntertainmentGames
Sample donated:
Last updated: July 11, 2019

The Keeping Children Safe ( KCS ) Coalition quotes ‘KCS is presently made up ofA 18 bureaus committed to making a safer universe for kids. The alliance recognises that all administrations coming into contact with kids have a cardinal responsibility of attention towards them. The alliance acknowledges the duties to maintain kids safe in both alleviation and development intercessions. The alliance is committed to safeguarding and purpose to accomplish the highest degree of protection for kids with whom we come into contact and to work towards accomplishing the international criterions developed by the KCS.

All bureaus systematically work towards accomplishing them and we expect to be held to account consequently ‘ . KCS, ( 2010 )A jeopardy is merely a characteristic of the physical or societal environment that is capable of doing injury: about anything can be a jeopardy to person. Risk, on the other manus, is a dual estimation of chance: how probably is it that something will go on, and what are the likely effects if it does? Risk has been defined mathematically as the merchandise of the chance and the public-service corporation of a possible future event ( Adams, 1996 ) .Beck ( 1992 ) argues that ‘risk is socially defined and constructed and as such is ductile and mutable.

Don't use plagiarized sources.
Get Your Custom Essay on "Making Children Feel Safe Social Work Essay..."
For You For Only $13.90/page!

Get custom paper

Theoretically, hazard can be positive or negative – so that we can speak about the ‘risk ‘ of, for illustration, winning the Lottery – but in mundane usage hazard normally has a negative intension.Blewett and Foley quote ‘The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ( UNCRC ) enshrines a wide scope of rights and rules that have besides influenced developments in safeguarding kids and kid public assistance in the UK. ‘ ( Blewett and Foley, 2008 pg 182 ) . For illustration:’Article 19 – Governments should guarantee that kids are decently cared for, and protect them from force, maltreatment and disregard by their parents or anyone else who looks after them ‘ . ( UNCRC, 1989 )Blewett and Foley quote ‘A protective environment has many constituents, but the key to edifice such an environment is that it is recognised as a corporate duty, with an understanding that all members of a society can lend to maintaining kids safe. This is the attack taken by the international kids ‘s administration the UNICEF in its Childhood Under Threat study ( 2004 ) . ( Blewett and Foley, 2008 pg 178 )The protective environment’Capacity of households and communities: All those who interact with kids – parents, instructors, and spiritual leaders alike – should detect protective child-rearing patterns and have the cognition, accomplishments, motive and support to acknowledge and react to development and maltreatment.

Government committedness and capacity: Governments should supply budgetary support for kid protection, follow appropriate public assistance policies to protect kids ‘s rights, and sign with few or no reserves international conventions refering kids ‘s rights and protection ‘ . ( UNICEF, 2004, p. 6 )The Staying Safe Action Plan is being published in response to the Staying Safe audience on the first of all time cross-Government scheme for bettering kids and immature people ‘s safety.A Staying Safe was launched for audience in July 2007, and during the audience period, parents, kids, immature people and general populace and practicians were asked about their concerns in relation to kids ‘s safety. Consequently, ‘The Plan sets out the work which Government will take forward over the following three old ages to drive betterments in kids and immature people ‘s safety, which will be measured to better kids and immature people ‘s safety.AThe Plan covers three chief countries:Universal safeguarding, affecting work to maintain all kids and immature people safe and to make safe environments for themTargeted safeguarding to cut down the hazards of injury for vulnerable groups of kids and immature peopleResponsive safeguarding, affecting reacting efficaciously when kids are harmed ‘ . DCSF ( 2008 )The overarching purpose of the Early Years Foundation Stage ( EYFS ) is to assist immature kids achieve the five Every Child Matters outcomes to:Be healthy ;Stay safe ;Enjoy and achieve ;Make a positive partAchieve economic wellbeing.

The EYFS will accomplish this purpose by a principled attack to:Puting criterions ;Promoting equality of chance ;Making a model for partnership working ;Bettering quality and consistence ;Puting a secure foundation for future Learning and development.The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children ( NSPCC ) states ‘The term ‘safeguarding ‘ describes the broader preventive and precautional attack to planning and processs that need to be in topographic point to protect kids and immature people from any possible injury or harm. It is about more than kid protection, although kid protection is one of import facet of safeguarding. Child protection involves recognizing marks of physical, sexual or emotional maltreatment or disregard and moving on it, while safeguarding involves maintaining kids and immature people safe from a much wider scope of possible injury and looks at preventive action, non merely reaction. Cyber intimidation, strong-arming and domestic force are alsoA signifiers of maltreatment ‘ .

( NSPCC, 2006 )The HM Government Document, ‘Working Together to Safeguard Children ‘ sets out how persons and organizationsA should work together to safeguard and advance the public assistance of kids. The counsel has been updated since the old 1999 version, A to reflect developments in pattern, policy and statute law ‘ . ( HM Government, 2006 pg 18A Guide for Practitioners: the cardinal alterations in Working Together to Safeguard Children 2010. The counsel came into force on 1st April 2010.

Working Together quotes ‘Given the badness of any ill-treatment suffered or damage to the kid ‘s wellness or development, the kid ‘s current demands and the capacity of the household to co-operate, what is the likeliness of accomplishing sufficient alteration within the Child ‘s clip frame? ‘ ( HM Government 2010 )The counsel is addressed to all practicians and front-line directors who have peculiar duties for safeguarding and advancing the public assistance of kids.A model for measuring ‘children in demand ‘ has been developed which provides a systematic manner of analyzing, understanding and entering what is go oning to kids and immature people within their households and the wider context of the community in which they live. From an inevitably complex issues and inter-relationships ; clear professional opinions can be made. These opinions include whether the kid being assessed is in demand, whether the kid is enduring or likely to endure important injury, what actions must be taken and which services would outdo run into the demands of this peculiar kid and household. The Guidance describes the Assessment Framework and the Government ‘s outlooks of how it will be used. It reflects the rules contained within the UNCRC, ratified by the Government in 1991 and the Human Rights Act 1998. In add-on, it takes history of relevant statute law at the clip of publication, but is peculiarly informed by the demands of the Children Act 1989, which provides a comprehensive model for the attention and protection of kids.

Blewett and Foley quote ‘The province ‘s duty for the protection of kids has raised of import inquiries for societal policy over the last 40 old ages. Debates around the safety of kids have been cardinal to the broader kid public assistance docket, bring forthing a scope of issues for those working with kids in statutory and voluntary bureaus ‘ ( Blewett and Foley, 2008 pg 179 ) .Ward suggested ‘that two implicit in inquiries have persisted throughout the series of arguments that have arisen around how kids can be protected and how they can be helped to remain safe ‘ ( Ward and Rose, 2002 ) .Fox Harding ( 1997 ) identified the undermentioned four political and philosophical places that have been present to greater and lesser grades in arguments about kid public assistance.

Laissez faire and patriarchate: supports merely minimum province intercession in the private life of the household.State paternalism and kid protection: supports extensive province intercession.The modern defense mechanism of the birth household and parents ‘ rights: besides supports extended province intercession, but believes that such intercession should be chiefly supportive, with an accent on early intercession and preventive steps.Children ‘s rights and child release: considers kids to be independent citizens with full civil rights, like grownups.Disabled kids frequently find themselves in vulnerable state of affairss where they are reliant on the aid of one or more people in order to populate their lives.

For illustration, a unsighted wheelchair kid may non hold any chance to take who will back up them and how many practicians will be portion of their day-to-day modus operandi. Practitioners will come into the lives of handicapped kid and travel out of their lives and these people have great power and control. Many people would deny that these state of affairss could be called ‘abusive ‘ and be deemed demeaning, degrading or discriminatory. This is because they would experience their personal actions or corporate patterns were being challenged or even threatened. It could be debated, that much of what happens is concerned with ‘educating ‘ non-disabled people.

It is of import to expose what takes topographic point in the lives of handicapped kid in order to get down a thorough scrutiny of such maltreatment.Some of the most insidious incidents, which occur in the lives of handicapped kid, have become common pattern. Those who dispense it make non acknowledge the maltreatment as inhuman treatment, but those on the having terminal know merely excessively good what is traveling on. To battle it, disabled kids either give up the battle or travel on to construct their ain defensive constructions for endurance. Disabled kids frequently have their ain mechanisms for covering with maltreatment, but it can be hard to hold a positive attack when maltreatment is invariably and systematically being applied. It could be debated, that much of what happens is concerned with ‘educating ‘ non-disabled people. It is of import to expose what takes topographic point in the lives of handicapped kid in order to get down a thorough scrutiny of such maltreatment.

While kids ‘s fright of offense and exploitation is related to populating in poorer vicinities, it is of import to recognize that kids ‘s safety and degrees of fright can be compromised in many, if non all, vicinities ( Blewett and Foley, 2008 ) . Deakin ( 2006 ) ‘reinforced this point when coverage on the findings of the Children and Young People ‘s Safety Survey, a study of the different signifiers of exploitation that 2420 immature people aged nine to sixteen experienced across a scope of different rural and urban vicinities. The study found that:most signifiers of exploitation involved kids of about similar ages or kids who were somewhat oldermost jobs occurred in either the street or local Parkss, although a significant minority of incidents took topographic point within schools ‘ . ( Deakin, 2006, pg 198 )Kathryn Cooper quotes ‘there is a large difference between “ being safe ” and “ taking a hazard ” . I believe that many people automatically think about kid protection and safeguarding issues when the topic of hazard is raised and in peculiar maltreatment in assorted signifiers. Whilst this is of import and evidently we need to do our kids aware of things like alien danger and cyberspace safety in my sentiment the “ hazard ” of our kids meeting this is likely rather low.

In contrast I think that our kids are subjected excessively much higher hazards to theirA physical well-being. Society today by and large exposes us to a much more sedentary life style than that experienced by old generationsA and the deficiency of exercising and/or healthy diet in many households poses a much greater hazard to kids ‘s long termA wellbeing ‘ ( Cooper, 2010 )In decision, it is non possible to protect kids from narratives of maltreatment or abduction in the intelligence such as Maddie McCann. If a kid is upset by a reported instance, we can be reassuring. It is critical to emphasize that these instances are really rare and that about all kids lead safe and happy lives and that merely a bantam per centum of grownups wounded kids in any manner.Building wellness and safety and hazard appraisal into the civilization of the scene ensures that hazard appraisals of topographic points, activities and trips. This needs to be built into the civilization of the scene and carried out at all locales and for all events and activities.

These appraisals should affect kids and immature people in order to raise their consciousness of possible dangers and safety steps.Life Education Centres, our purpose is to present synergistic programmes from nursery through to twelvemonth 6, learning about drug and wellness issues, which really empower immature people to do healthy picks.’Staying safe ‘ 11.

2 Listening to kids from Saltley Cluster, BirminghamSimone aˆ¦The safety and public assistance of kids, or Safeguarding, means protecting kids from all signifiers of maltreatment. It is of import we get the facts about safeguarding, so we are cognizant of the dangers and can protect the kids, but it is merely every bit critical we do non panic and mother them.

Choose your subject


I'm Jessica!

Don't know how to start your paper? Worry no more! Get professional writing assistance from me.

Click here