Do you think that this cartoon was published in a nazi newspaper or by their opponents? Use the source and your own knowleadge to explain your answer.I think that this source is pro – Nazi firstly because the source shows poor quality meat being searved to the Germans my evidence for this is that in the source the jewish are puting a rat into the mincer.Secondly that the jews want to kill the Germans my evidence for this is that there are goose hanging from the ceeling which represent the German soliders because the German soliders take steeps like goose when they march.Thirdly and lastly it shows a typical jew with a big nose and being fat. I also think that it proves that Jews are evil, wealthy and greedy.Is this an accurate account of the view of all Germans in Nazi Germany? Use the source and your own knowledge to explain your answer.I think that this source is not an accurate account of all germans firstly because its only interviewing one person so therefore it bias and its also a one person view its not like thisperson who was interviewing went and asked every single German in Germany wha they thought about hitler if he/she had done then maybe but because its only the view of only one person it is difficult almost impossible to say that thats what all Germans thought.
Secondly the person they are interviewing Alfons Heck was a member of the hitler youth, so therefore once again proves the point of it being bias beacause not all of Germanys population was a member of Hitler Youth. For example the Edelweiss pirates and Catholic church.Thirdly Because it is only one part of the interview it was writen 51 years later so the person being interviewed might have forgotten things or might just lie to make himself look good in front of others or hitler because he was interviewed when hitler was still alive.
Fourthly it says at the begining that “Until Kristallnact” which is quite funny that it only says until beacuse after Kristallnact everyone had found out what Hitler was like so its only telling one side of the story.This Source shows a typical image of the Nazi policy towards Jews. Was it correct? Use the source and your own knowladge to explain your answer.
I think that it was and was not a typical image of the nazi policy.Firstly yes because it shows bald and naked women who are extremly unhealthy. It shows that every thing has been taken off these women and from my only knowladge I can say that these women are not being feed properly and their hair has been shaved off 2 make blankets.Secondly yes because the women are being devided and I think that they are being devided judging from the fact weather they are healthy enough to work.I also think that this source is not a typical image of the Nazi policy.
Firstly because it is bias one sided view and there is a large quntity of women who are very skiny and unhealthy. From my knowladge and what i have studied It is Anti – Nazism and may exaggerate.Secondly because it is only a snapshot and it only shows part of the Nazi policy it does not show dehuminastion, discrimination and it does not link to the Nurenburg Laws and not to forget its by a former inmate.Do you think this cartoon was published by the Nazis or by their opponents? Use the source and your own knowlage to explain your answer.I think that this source is published by the Nazis opponents.Firstly because it shows that the women is worn out because shes given birth to 12 children which shows that it is done by the opponents because the Nazis would only promote Labensborn ( having kids) not discourge women from having kids which exactly what this source id doing.Secondly the Nazis would promote an ideal German women to be healthy, fit, blonde hair but this source shows an old women with wrinkles.
Which basically again proves that it is done by the opponents and its also taking the mocery out of ceremony and i also think they have got a picture of hitler there to state that hitler is always looking over the German people. But the weird thing is that Hitler wants to incourge women having kids but he does not have any kids himself.Thirdly it is Anti – Nazi but it uses propaganda and cencership i also think that its an accution to sell this women because as u can see all of the people in the croud are male.
Is this an accurate account of the experince of the women in Nazi Germany? Use the source and your own knoeladge to explain your answer.I think this was and was not an accurate account of the experince of women in Nazi Germany.Firstly yes because Hitler accapted that women should give birth to children and increase labensborn (increase population) and Hitlers quote which was ” to bring children into the world.I think it was not an accurate account.Firstly because it does not reveal the truth because it says “mission of women to be beautiful” when women had to work but their sole job was to stay at home bvut they did have to work.
Which says that their mission was to work not to stay at home and look after kids or have kids.Secondly Its written by J Geobbles which proves it is bias because hes a man he is not experinced of being a women so therfore could not be 100% correct and plus he was the propaganda minister his job was to show the way Nazi life should be not the way it attcully was.This source shows an ideal Nazi family.
Was it correct? Use the source and your own knowladge to explain your answer.I think this was an ideal Nazi family.Firstly because its got the women with 4 kids which is already promoting labensborn it shows them all happy it shows the boy digging which was the link from German blood to German soil.Secondly the little girl with the doll practicing to be a mother the women breast feeding her baby promoting love and dedication towords being a mum it also could promote that she enjoys being being a mum thats why shes got four kids.Thirdly the flowers all glomming which shows happiness and shows that the family are happy they get food they have a house to live in and are very happy.Fourtly the cat which completes the family having a pet completes every family so this is an ideal Nazi family.