Socialism for the public rather than private ownership

Topics: EconomicsCapitalism

Type:

Sample donated:

Last updated: August 11, 2019

Socialism is social andeconomic doctrine that requires for the public rather than private ownership orcontrol of property and natural resources. According to the way the socialistssee it, it’s more like that individuals don’t live or work isolated but live incooperation with each other. Everything that people produce is in some sense asocial product, and everyone who contributes to the production of a good mustput some sort of share in it. Society should own or at least control propertyfor the benefit of all its members.

There are many positive things and well asnegative things about socialism. The positive things can be that it makeseveryone equal and that the government will help the people for free but someof the negative things can be that because everyone is equal you won’t be ableto get rich. There are some things about socialism such as you don’t own your things,but the government owns it, the government owns most of everything such thingsas the oil, diamonds, houses and the government own the profit as well. Thissystem is mainly very appealing to the poor as they have much help from thegovernment and they aren’t left out and they get a lot of resources andbenefits from the government which helps them a lot. The minimum wage staysthat’s the type of system socialism is. Not where the rich keep getting richerand the poor getting poorer.

Don't use plagiarized sources.
Get Your Custom Essay on "Socialism for the public rather than private ownership..."
For You For Only $13.90/page!


Get custom paper

This is a system where things are kept stable andthe same and equal for everyone and things don’t get unequal and they are allthe same doesn’t matter how much money you have or how much land you own orwhatever you have.There were many men who came upand combined the ideas to create something such as Socialism. One of them was Henride Saint Simon and another was Charles Fourier, Blanc and another was Proudhon.Henri de Saint Simon optimistically proclaimed thewidespread possibilities on manufactured development.

The doers would cordially diagram the financial system yet guide such foregoing with theaid of assignment considerable community mill tasks and other things thenorganizing investments banks. Henri de Saint Simon also stressed a very large amountabout the morals and terms that would be very important as the social institutionshould have as its main goal to improve the conditions of the poor. CharlesFourier envisaged a socialist utopia regarding mathematically unique self enough communities known as phalanxes every committed over regarding 1620 people. according to Charles Fourier underneath capitalism young single female have been shamelessly sold inimitation of theirs after husbands becauseof dowries and mean financial issues therefore that known as because of the abolition onmarriage or for the sexual freedom yet fair unions only based over stability. PierreJoseph was a part educated writer he claimed so property was once a income that was stolen out of the worker, who was once the source over every the wealth.distrustful concerning entire authority yet politic structures Proudhon believethat states must stay abolished and that class should remain prepared among loose associations over working people.Louis Blanc believed so states need to put in above administration funded workshops or factories according to warranty fulfilled employment.

As industrialization advanced into European cities, working people commenced accordingto embrace the socialistmessage. 

Choose your subject

x

Hi!
I'm Jessica!

Don't know how to start your paper? Worry no more! Get professional writing assistance from me.

Click here