Type: Persuasive Essays
Sample donated: Mable Vaughn
Last updated: November 15, 2019
On there own sources F and G are useful to a diminutive extent.
However it is when they are put together in context that they become very useful. Source F is an over the top propaganda poster produced by the government in 1916 for a governmental campaign. Women are portrayed as heroines for their “war effort. ” It aims to persuade women to enrol as munitions workers by showing a woman putting on her uniform and getting ready to work in an ammunition factory.This image is extremely persuasive as it indicates that those women who did enrol would be like the one in the poster, a woman who represents the peak of prevailing, liberation and fidelity for her country. The utility of this source is lowered due to the fact that the poster is a propaganda piece which is usually created to influence upon opinion hence in this case encourage women into industry. Another way in which the poster is persuasive is through an image in the background, which consists of a soldier preparing some weapons.By placing these munitions in the poster, the government was trying to remind women that weapons like those in the picture were needed for the nation’s men to win the war.
The main limitation of this source is the fact that it is a piece of propaganda that has been designed to influence and amend opinions. Therefore, the positive side about female munitions workers has been included and the negative side, for example, the poster fails to emphasize the dangers of munitions work has been excluded.Also, the source lacks to tell us about how many women actually enrolled since 1914, how many ammunitions were actually manufactured by women since 1914 up to 1916, the year in which the poster was produced, or if similar posters had worked before. On the other Although it being a propaganda piece it may be able to be trusted as it could be supported by source G. Source G is a set of statistics from a school textbook, published in the 1980’s showing the number of women in employment in four different industries in Britain between July 1914 and July 1918.
We instantly know that the source can be trusted as it is from a school textbook, a secondary source of which the author would have researched. From the source we can see that by July 1918, 424, 000 more women were working in metal industries, 64, 000 more women were working in chemical industries, 223, 000 more women were working in government offices and 39, 000 more women were working in food, drink and tobacco industries.This suggests source F to be successful as posters similar to these were having an effect on the minds of women and there employment in Britain was significantly rising. In conclusion, both sources are useful as evidence to an extent. And as I said earlier they are even more utile when seen as supporting each other. Source F could be the answer for reason why so many women were entering the industrial workforce as conveyed in the bunch of statistic in source G.